League classification archive
Denmark · 2026/2027
Superliga
Denmark. 12 teams in the 2026/2027 season. Every figure on this page is calculated from completed fixtures only; 73 scheduled fixtures are excluded.
- Teams
- 12
- Completed fixtures
- 59
- Scheduled fixtures
- 73
- Season
- 2026/2027
- 3.0Goals / matchAcross 59 completed fixtures.
- 59%Both teams scoredAcross 59 completed fixtures.
- NordsjællandShot volume leader17.9 shots per match, the highest published figure.
- FC KøbenhavnConversion leader17.0% of shots resulted in goals, the highest published rate.
- NordsjællandPossession & TerritoryMore possession and more corners than most teams in the league.
Team data
Current table
Table based on completed matches in our data. Three points for a win. Official points deductions are not included.
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC København | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 10 | 14 | 24 | WWWWL |
| 2 | FC Midtjylland | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 22 | WDWDW |
| 3 | Viborg FF | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 20 | WLDWW |
| 4 | Nordsjælland | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 18 | LDWLD |
| 5 | Brøndby IF | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 16 | LLLLW |
| 6 | Horsens | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 19 | -1 | 12 | LWLDD |
| 7 | Silkeborg IF | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 11 | DDDWD |
| 8 | Randers FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 10 | WWLLL |
| 9 | Odense BK | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 10 | DLWDD |
| 10 | Lyngby Boldklub | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 7 | DWDLL |
| 11 | AGF | 9 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 5 | LLDLD |
| 12 | Sønderjyske Fodbold | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 5 | LLLDW |
Results & fixtures
Latest completed matches, and the next round that has not been fully played.
| Date | Home | Score | Away | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026 | FC Midtjylland | 2–1 | FC København | Match report |
| 11 Oct 2026 | Brøndby IF | 5–2 | Lyngby Boldklub | Match report |
| 11 Oct 2026 | Silkeborg IF | 3–3 | Horsens | Match report |
| 11 Oct 2026 | Randers FC | 0–2 | Viborg FF | Match report |
| 09 Oct 2026 | Nordsjælland | 0–0 | Odense BK | Match report |
| 20 Sept 2026 | Viborg FF | 4–1 | Nordsjælland | Match report |
| 20 Sept 2026 | Horsens | 2–2 | AGF | Match report |
| 20 Sept 2026 | Brøndby IF | 0–1 | FC København | Match report |
| 20 Sept 2026 | Sønderjyske Fodbold | 4–2 | Randers FC | Match report |
| 19 Sept 2026 | Odense BK | 1–1 | FC Midtjylland | Match report |
| 18 Sept 2026 | Lyngby Boldklub | 0–4 | Silkeborg IF | Match report |
| 14 Sept 2026 | FC Midtjylland | 4–1 | Brøndby IF | Match report |
Attack & defence rankings
Compare teams across the league for goals, clean sheets, scoring rates and other match results.
| Rank | Team | Per match |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC København | 2.40 |
| 2 | FC Midtjylland | 1.90 |
| 3 | Horsens | 1.80 |
| 4 | Brøndby IF | 1.70 |
| 5 | Viborg FF | 1.70 |
| 6 | Silkeborg IF | 1.50 |
| 7 | Nordsjælland | 1.40 |
| 8 | Sønderjyske Fodbold | 1.33 |
| 9 | AGF | 1.22 |
| 10 | Lyngby Boldklub | 1.20 |
| 11 | Randers FC | 1.10 |
| 12 | Odense BK | 0.80 |
Team shot rankings
Compare teams by shots, shots on target and scoring efficiency. Figures are built from recorded player shots in completed league matches.
| Rank | Team | Per match |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nordsjælland | 17.9 |
| 2 | AGF | 16.8 |
| 3 | FC København | 15.7 |
| 4 | Brøndby IF | 15.1 |
| 5 | Odense BK | 14.8 |
| 6 | Lyngby Boldklub | 14.7 |
| 7 | Viborg FF | 14.4 |
| 8 | FC Midtjylland | 13.6 |
| 9 | Silkeborg IF | 12.7 |
| 10 | Horsens | 11.8 |
| 11 | Sønderjyske Fodbold | 11.6 |
| 12 | Randers FC | 10.6 |
Attacking output context
See how each team's shot volume and scoring rate compare with the rest of the league.
| Team | Shots / match | Goals / shot | Output context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordsjælland | 17.9 | 7.8% | High Volume / Low Conversion |
| AGF | 16.8 | 7.3% | High Volume / Low Conversion |
| FC København | 15.7 | 17.0% | High Volume / High Conversion |
| Brøndby IF | 15.1 | 11.3% | High Volume / Low Conversion |
| Odense BK | 14.8 | 5.4% | High Volume / Low Conversion |
| Lyngby Boldklub | 14.7 | 8.2% | Balanced Output |
| Viborg FF | 14.4 | 11.8% | Balanced Output |
| FC Midtjylland | 13.6 | 14.0% | Low Volume / High Conversion |
| Silkeborg IF | 12.7 | 13.2% | Low Volume / High Conversion |
| Horsens | 11.8 | 15.3% | Low Volume / High Conversion |
| Sønderjyske Fodbold | 11.6 | 11.5% | Low Volume / Average Conversion |
| Randers FC | 10.6 | 11.6% | Low Volume / Average Conversion |
Team possession
| Team | Average possession | Matches measured |
|---|---|---|
| Nordsjælland | 56.4% | 10 |
| AGF | 56.1% | 9 |
| Brøndby IF | 54.2% | 10 |
| Odense BK | 52.9% | 10 |
| FC København | 52.0% | 10 |
| Lyngby Boldklub | 51.0% | 10 |
| FC Midtjylland | 49.5% | 10 |
| Silkeborg IF | 49.0% | 10 |
| Viborg FF | 48.1% | 10 |
| Horsens | 45.7% | 10 |
| Randers FC | 45.0% | 10 |
| Sønderjyske Fodbold | 39.7% | 9 |
Average possession in completed league matches this season. More possession does not necessarily mean better performance.
Territory context
See how each team's possession and corner numbers compare with the rest of the league.
| Team | Possession | Corners / match | Territory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordsjælland | 56.4% | 5.9 | Possession & Territory |
| AGF | 56.1% | 7.1 | Possession & Territory |
| Brøndby IF | 54.2% | 6.3 | Possession & Territory |
| Odense BK | 52.9% | 6.4 | Possession & Territory |
| FC København | 52.0% | 4.3 | Possession Without Corner Volume |
| Lyngby Boldklub | 51.0% | 5.6 | Direct Territory |
| FC Midtjylland | 49.5% | 5.4 | Balanced Territory |
| Silkeborg IF | 49.0% | 4.3 | Limited Territory |
| Viborg FF | 48.1% | 5.1 | Limited Territory |
| Horsens | 45.7% | 3.0 | Limited Territory |
| Randers FC | 45.0% | 4.0 | Limited Territory |
| Sønderjyske Fodbold | 39.7% | 4.3 | Limited Territory |
Methodology
Data source
Match, lineup, event and player statistics come from Sportmonks and are stored per fixture. Only completed fixtures with recorded minutes are aggregated. Announced lineups and future fixtures are excluded.
Per 90 minutes
A per-90 value scales a season total to a full match: total × 90 ÷ minutes played. It is not calculated when minutes are missing or zero.
Missing data
The provider omits some statistics instead of sending a zero. A missing value is shown as "not available" and never converted to 0, so rates and percentiles are only produced where the underlying fields genuinely exist.
Impact Score
The Football Performance Lab Impact Score is an experimental in-house model that combines role-relative percentile families with explicit weights. It is not an official rating and not a measure of transfer value.
Minimum samples
Values are calculated internally from 180 minutes, but a player is only shown publicly with a ranked Impact Score from 360 minutes and 5 appearances, with at least 90% metric coverage and an established role. A single appearance contributes a match impact observation from 30 minutes.