Randers FC
Randers FC are 8th in the Superliga after 9 matches in the 2026/2027 season. They have won 3 matches, scored 11 goals and conceded 14.
They average 1.22 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in 22% of their league matches.
- Competition
- Superliga (Denmark)
- Season
- 2026/2027
- Position
- 8 of 12Based on completed matches
- Team Strength
- 40.0FootyCabin rating, 0–100
- Founded
- 2003
- Form
- Loss
- Loss
- Win
- Win
- Loss
- Loss
Team intelligence
What stands out
- Low Volume / High ConversionFewer shots than the league average, but a higher scoring rate.
- Limited TerritoryLess possession and fewer corners than most teams in the league.
Season summary
Calculated from completed matches only. Scheduled matches are never counted.
- Matches played
- 9
- Wins
- 3
- Draws
- 1
- Losses
- 5
- Goals scored
- 11
- Goals conceded
- 14
- Goal difference
- -3
- Points
- 10
1.11 per match
Efficiency Rates
Success rates for passing, shooting, dribbling, duels and defending.
| Statistic | Rate |
|---|---|
| Pass accuracy | 76.0% |
| Shots on target rate | 30.2% |
| Dribble success | 47.0% |
| Duel win rate | 54.2% |
| Aerial win rate | 95.7% |
| Tackle success | 60.0% |
0–100% scale
Team performance
Team totals built from recorded player statistics in 9 completed matches.
| Statistic | Total | Per match | Matches with data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 63 | 7.00 | 9 |
| Shots on target | 19 | 2.71 | 7 |
| Passes | 2,899 | 322.11 | 9 |
| Accurate passes | 2,203 | 244.78 | 9 |
| Passes into the final third | 377 | 41.89 | 9 |
| Key passes | 40 | 5.71 | 7 |
| Chances created | 48 | 6.00 | 8 |
| Successful dribbles | 39 | 4.33 | 9 |
| Tackles | 115 | 12.78 | 9 |
| Interceptions | 82 | 9.11 | 9 |
| Clearances | 218 | 24.22 | 9 |
| Ball recoveries | 300 | 33.33 | 9 |
| Duels | 598 | 66.44 | 9 |
| Duels won | 324 | 36.00 | 9 |
| Aerial duels | 93 | 13.29 | 7 |
| Aerial duels won | 89 | 11.13 | 8 |
| Goalkeeper saves | 27 | 3.86 | 7 |
These are calculated from player data rather than official team totals. A dash or "not available" means no value was recorded. It never means zero.
How this team plays
See how this team's playing style compares with the rest of the league. Higher scores mean the team shows more of that style, not that it is better.
Team style
Low-Possession Defence
Sees less of the ball than most league teams and records more defensive activity.
Style summary: Defensive Activity. A descriptive summary of the profile below, not a rating.
- Possession13
Possession is well below the league average. (44.2%, 9 fixtures)
- Attacking output4
Attacking output is well below the league average. (9.89 per match, 9 fixtures)
- Chance creation13
Chance creation is well below the league average. (8.22 per match, 9 fixtures)
- Defensive activity96
Defensive activity is well above the league average. (81.56 per match, 9 fixtures)
- Ball security29
Ball security is below the league average. (80.5%, 9 fixtures)
Scores run from 0 to 100 and compare this team with the 12 teams in the same league and season. Higher means more of that characteristic, not better.
Style context
Shows how this team's playing-style characteristics relate to league performance patterns this season.
This is descriptive context, not evidence that a playing style causes better or worse results.
- Attacking outputTeam score: 4High-attacking output teams: 1.62 points / matchLow-attacking output teams: 1.00 points / match
This team is in the league's low-attacking output group.
High-attacking output teams average 0.62 more points per match than low-attacking output teams.
- Chance creationTeam score: 13High-chance creation teams: 1.62 points / matchLow-chance creation teams: 1.00 points / match
This team is in the league's low-chance creation group.
High-chance creation teams average 0.62 more points per match than low-chance creation teams.
- Ball securityTeam score: 29High-ball security teams: 1.53 points / matchLow-ball security teams: 1.14 points / match
This team is in the league's low-ball security group.
High-ball security teams average 0.39 more points per match than low-ball security teams.
Possession profile
Territory context
Limited Territory
Less possession and fewer corners than most teams in the league.
- Possession:
- 13 / 100
- Corners:
- 13 / 100
Scores run from 0 to 100 and compare this team with the rest of the league. Higher means more of that characteristic, not better performance.
- Average possession
- 44.2%
- Home
- 46.0%
- Away
- 42.0%
Based on 9 of 9 completed matches.
Recent results
Latest completed matches, newest first.
| Date | Opponent | Venue | Score | Result | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Sept 2026 | Sønderjyske Fodbold | Away | 2–4 | Loss | Superliga |
| 13 Sept 2026 | Odense BK | Home | 1–2 | Loss | Superliga |
| 06 Sept 2026 | Brøndby IF | Away | 3–0 | Win | Superliga |
| 30 Aug 2026 | AGF | Home | 2–1 | Win | Superliga |
| 23 Aug 2026 | FC Midtjylland | Away | 0–1 | Loss | Superliga |
| 16 Aug 2026 | FC København | Home | 0–4 | Loss | Superliga |
| 09 Aug 2026 | Lyngby Boldklub | Home | 2–0 | Win | Superliga |
| 02 Aug 2026 | Nordsjælland | Away | 0–1 | Loss | Superliga |
| 27 Jul 2026 | Silkeborg IF | Home | 1–1 | Draw | Superliga |
Home and away
Home and away records this season.
| Split | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| Away | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 3 |
Attack & defence
How the team has performed in attack and defence across completed league matches this season.
Attack
Defence
Match pattern
Standout players
The team's leading players by FootyCabin Impact Score this season. Players are shown once they have enough match data.
- 1Sabil HansenView player
Full back
Impact 59.4·Defensive Activity 89.1
Defensive Full-Back
Best category: Defensive Activity
- 2Daniel HøeghView player
Centre back
Impact 58.8·Defensive Reliability 91.2
Aerial Defender
Best category: Defensive Reliability
- 3Elies MahmoudView player
Attacking midfielder
Impact 55.3·Defensive Activity 75.0
Direct Winger
Best category: Defensive Activity
Squad
Players used this season, ordered by minutes played. Impact Score is shown once a player has enough match data.
| Player | Role | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Høegh | Centre back | 9 | 810 | — | — | 58.8 |
| Elies Mahmoud | Attacking midfielder | 9 | 740 | 3 | 1 | 55.3 |
| Laurits Pedersen | Defensive midfielder | 9 | 737 | 1 | 2 | 55.0 |
| Mike Themsen | Winger | 9 | 726 | 3 | 1 | 54.5 |
| Mathias Greve | Defensive midfielder | 9 | 697 | — | — | 44.8 |
| Nikolas Dyhr | Full back | 9 | 611 | — | — | 25.5 |
| M. Sjølstad | Winger | 9 | 588 | — | 1 | 36.3 |
| Sabil Hansen | Full back | 8 | 580 | — | 2 | 59.4 |
| Wessel Dammers | Centre back | 5 | 450 | — | — | 47.4 |
| Kasper Junker | Striker | 9 | 431 | 1 | 1 | 39.4 |
| Jannich Storch | Goalkeeper | 5 | 406 | — | — | 51.9 |
| Paul Izzo | Goalkeeper | 5 | 404 | — | — | 45.4 |
| John Björkengren | Defensive midfielder | 6 | 398 | — | — | 46.7 |
| Mohamed Sankoh | Striker | 8 | 327 | 3 | — | Sample too small |
| Nikolai Hopland | Centre back | 2 | 180 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Cyril Edudzi | Striker | 4 | 158 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Frederik Lauenborg | Defensive midfielder | 3 | 158 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Lucas Lissens | Full back | 2 | 121 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Simon Stüker | Full back | 2 | 93 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Hector Lux Høyrup | Role not established | 5 | 72 | — | 1 | Sample too small |
| Felix Sommer | Role not established | 3 | 61 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Axel Henriksson | Role not established | 2 | 42 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Amady Camara | Role not established | 2 | 35 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Benjamin Orn | Role not established | 2 | 30 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Oliver Jones | Role not established | 2 | 24 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Ousseynou Fall Seck | Role not established | 1 | 10 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Musa Touré | Role not established | 1 | 6 | — | — | Sample too small |
| Amin Al-Hamawi | Role not established | 1 | 4 | — | — | Sample too small |
Appearances and minutes are from completed matches. Players who have played for more than one club this season are marked.
Squad by role
Players grouped by position. Impact data is shown only when there is enough match data.
Goalkeeper
Goalkeeper
Centre back
- View player
- Wessel DammersView player
Impact 47.4·Defensive Activity 50.0
Full back
- View player
- Nikolas DyhrView player
Impact 25.5·Ball Security 15.2
Defensive midfielder
- View player
- John BjörkengrenView player
Impact 46.7·Ball Security 81.7
- Mathias GreveView player
Impact 44.8·Defensive Activity 45.0
Attacking midfielder
Winger
- Mike ThemsenView player
Impact 54.5·Defensive Activity 92.2
- M. SjølstadView player
Impact 36.3·Defensive Activity 89.1
Team impact leaders
The team's highest Impact Scores this season, alongside each player's playing style. Playing style describes how they play, not how good they are. How this is built
- 1Sabil HansenFull backDefensive Full-Back59.4/100
- 2Daniel HøeghCentre backAerial Defender58.8/100
- 3Elies MahmoudAttacking midfielderDirect Winger55.3/100
Squad archetype profile
The most common playing styles in the squad this season.
- Aerial Defender117%
- Ball-Winning Midfielder117%
- Box-Command Goalkeeper117%
- Defensive Full-Back117%
- Direct Winger117%
- Shot-Focused Goalkeeper117%
Based on 6 players with enough data for a playing-style classification.
Player contributions
Team leaders for minutes, goals, assists and Impact Score this season.
Most minutes
All completed fixtures this season.
- 1Daniel Høegh810minutes
- 2Elies Mahmoud740minutes
- 3Laurits Pedersen737minutes
- 4Mike Themsen726minutes
- 5Mathias Greve697minutes
Most goals
Season totals from imported match data.
- 1Elies Mahmoud3goals
- 2Mike Themsen3goals
- 3Mohamed Sankoh3goals
- 4Laurits Pedersen1goals
- 5Kasper Junker1goals
Most assists
Season totals from imported match data.
- 1Laurits Pedersen2assists
- 2Sabil Hansen2assists
- 3Elies Mahmoud1assists
- 4Mike Themsen1assists
- 5M. Sjølstad1assists
Highest Impact Score
Only players who meet the publishable sample and coverage rules.
- 1Sabil Hansen59.4/ 100
- 2Daniel Høegh58.8/ 100
- 3Elies Mahmoud55.3/ 100
- 4Laurits Pedersen55.0/ 100
- 5Mike Themsen54.5/ 100
Methodology
Data source
Match, lineup, event and player statistics come from Sportmonks and are stored per fixture. Only completed fixtures with recorded minutes are aggregated. Announced lineups and future fixtures are excluded.
Per 90 minutes
A per-90 value scales a season total to a full match: total × 90 ÷ minutes played. It is not calculated when minutes are missing or zero.
Missing data
The provider omits some statistics instead of sending a zero. A missing value is shown as "not available" and never converted to 0, so rates and percentiles are only produced where the underlying fields genuinely exist.
Impact Score
The Football Performance Lab Impact Score is an experimental in-house model that combines role-relative percentile families with explicit weights. It is not an official rating and not a measure of transfer value.
Minimum samples
Values are calculated internally from 180 minutes, but a player is only shown publicly with a ranked Impact Score from 360 minutes and 5 appearances, with at least 90% metric coverage and an established role. A single appearance contributes a match impact observation from 30 minutes.